Sharks are usually viewed as solitary predators… However, my last study that has just been published in the journal Animal Behaviour shows the contrary: sharks can have preferred companions and a complex social structure, even at a small scale (10km coastline).
Here is the Abstract of the scientific article (you can find it here).
Here are also selected press related articles:
Evidence of social communities in a spatially structured network of a free-ranging shark species
|Laboratoire d’Excellence « CORAIL » and USR 3278 CNRS-EPHE, Centre de Recherche Insulaire et Observatoire de l’Environnement (CRIOBE) and Centre de Biologie et d’Ecologie Tropicale et Méditerranéenne, France|
Received 5 April 2011; revised 30 June 2011; Accepted 14 October 2011. MS. number: 11-00283. Available online 19 December 2011.
Large, solitary, marine predators such as sharks have been observed to aggregate at specific areas. Such aggregations are almost certainly driven by foraging and behavioural strategies making space for diverse spatial organizations. Reef-associated shark species often show strong patterns of site fidelity that could be viewed as a prerequisite for sociality. However, there is limited empirical evidence that such aggregations are driven by intrinsic social factors. Association data for blacktip reef sharks, Carcharhinus melanopterus, were obtained from photoidentification surveys conducted in Moorea coral reefs (French Polynesia). We adapted a social network approach to demonstrate evidence of four main communities and two subcommunities within the population. We confronted the resulting structure with candidate explanatory variables. Sharks formed spatial groups characterized by nonrandom and long-term associations, despite opportunities for social relationships to develop between communities. Sex and length of sharks tended to influence assortment at the population and community levels. Individual space use also explained community structure, although spatial assortment was globally weaker than random expectations, suggesting that observed associations were not an artefact of the sampling design or spatial distribution of individuals. We conclude that the observed grouping patterns not only resulted from passive aggregations for specific resources, but rather the communities developed from an active choice of individuals as a sign of sociability. Individual preferences and adaptation to local conditions, as well as demographic, ecological and anthropogenic factors, may explain the social variability between communities. This suggests that a stable grouping strategy may confer substantial benefits in this marine predator.