How trophic interactions shift after birth in juvenile sharks?

Short-term shifts of stable isotope (δ13C, δ15N) values in juvenile sharks within nursery areas suggest rapid shifts in energy pathways

Our lastest paper is out!

Born from a recent collaboration with the Heithaus lab (Mike Heithaus, Jeremy Kiszka and Phil Matich), we investigated the short-term shifts of stable isotope signatures in juveniles of 3 shark species: the blacktip reef shark Carcharhinus melanopterus, the sicklefin lemon shark Negaprion acutidens and the bull shark Carcharhinus leucas.

Bull sharks samples were taken from the Heithaus project in Everglades while blacktip reef and sicklefin lemon shark samples were taken during my PhD project and ongoing projects in Moorea.

Image1

Link to the paper: Here

Abstract:

We quantified temporal changes in blood plasma δ13C and δ15N values collected from recaptured juvenile blacktip reef sharks (Carcharhinus melanopterus, n = 14) and sicklefin lemon sharks (Negaprion acutidens, n = 4) at liberty in Moorea, French Polynesia for 10-50 days, and juvenile bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas, n = 7) at liberty in the Florida Coastal Everglades for 34–127 days to investigate shifts in assimilated biomass from energy reserves and consumed biomass. Blacktip reef and bull sharks exhibited significant changes in plasma δ13C as they grew, with a mean Δ δ13C/cm total length ± SD of 0.41‰/cm ± 0.72 and–0.82‰/cm ± 0.67. While low sample sizes precluded statistical analyses, sicklefin lemon exhibited a change of 0.49‰/cm ± 0.77. Blacktip reef sharks and bull sharks also exhibited significant shifts in δ15N values − mean Δ δ15N/cm TL ± SD = −0.23‰/cm ± 0.59, and −0.24‰/cm ± 0.20; shifts in δ15N values for sicklefin lemon sharks averaged 0.19‰/cm ± 0.52. When data were normalized across species (accounting for species-specific difference in δ13C and δ15N ranges), no significant difference were found in the rate of δ15N change between bull and blacktip reef sharks, but mean changes in δ13C/day among blacktip reef and sicklefin lemon sharks (~1%/day) were twice as fast as bull sharks (~0.5%/day). Comparisons between plasma and muscle isotope values in bull sharks yielded similar results to comparisons of plasma isotope values — rapid changes in δ13C and δ15N. The magnitude and direction of changes in δ13C and δ15N values, however, were not uniform among individuals within each species, suggesting intraspecific variation in trophic interactions within the shark nurseries studied. Further studies quantifying shifts in energy pathways may contribute to elucidating the factors that shape foraging development in sharks and variation in trophic interactions within shark nurseries.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s